arXiv
Surprisingly Simple and Effective Multi-Domain Graph Foundation Model through Graph-to-Table Alignment
Chunyu Hu, Tianyin Liao, Ge Lan, Xingxuan Zhang, Jianxin Li, Peng Cui, Ziwei Zhang
Problem
Graph foundation models must choose between GNN-based methods that need lots of graph-specific data and LLM-based methods reliant on text attributes; the paper asks whether tabular foundation models can serve as a text-free GFM backbone instead.
Method
GTAlign pretrains a domain-agnostic graph encoder, then aligns graph structure to the input format of a tabular foundation model (LimiX-16M, also validated with TabPFNv2.5) via community-guided continual pretraining, enabling few-shot in-context node/graph classification.
Results
On five benchmarks (Cora, CiteSeer, PubMed, Photo, Computers), 5-shot node classification beats the strongest baseline BRIDGE by 5-25 points (e.g. Cora 88.65% vs 63.85%); graph-classification gains are smaller and it trails baselines at 1-shot.
Limitations
Graph-level transfer lags node-level transfer due to pooling information loss; evaluated on only two domains (citation networks, e-commerce); generalization to novel graph types beyond the pretraining mixture is untested.
arXiv
DAG-FM: A Foundation Model for Causal Discovery under Heterogeneous Causal Mechanisms
Yikang Chen, Zhengkang Guan, Haoyuan Qian, Peng Cui, Yi Yang, Kun Kuang
Problem
Causal discovery from tabular observational data is slow and dataset-specific, and struggles when the underlying causal mechanisms vary; the goal is one model that works zero-shot across mechanism types.
Method
DAG-FM trains a transformer 'prior-fitted network' - TabPFN's recipe - on synthetic causal graphs spanning four mechanism families, then infers a DAG in one pass using a tabular row-column interaction block and a mixture-of-leaf-experts router.
Results
Beats prior amortized causal-discovery models (TabCausal, FoundCause) on synthetic data (F1 0.64 vs 0.54/0.57) and on the real Sachs dataset (F1 0.53 vs 0.33); scales to 500 variables or 50k samples on one GPU.
Limitations
Assumes causal sufficiency (no unobserved confounders); trained at a fixed sample size (n=1024) though it generalizes to others at test time; underperforms a baseline on the Causal Chamber dataset.
arXiv
CDFM: Towards a General-Purpose Causal Discovery Foundation Model
Jie Qiao, Ruichu Cai, Zijian Li, Weilin Chen, Pengfei Hua, Boyan Xu, Zhengming Chen, Zhifeng Hao, Peng Cui
Problem
Existing causal-discovery algorithms are hand-tailored per data type and don't transfer; CDFM aims for one foundation model that does zero-shot structural inference across unknown causal mechanisms.
Method
Following TabPFN's playbook, CDFM pretrains on a massive synthetic space of structural causal models with a variational framework that treats the unknown causal mechanism as a latent variable, decomposed into tractable learning modules.
Results
On synthetic data (15 mechanism families) it reaches AUROC 0.888 vs 0.786 for TabCausal at 4,000 samples, and holds AUROC above 0.87 at 100 variables where the best competitor drops to ~0.75; also wins on Causal Chamber and Tubingen cause-effect pairs.
Limitations
Likely: only 15% of synthetic training batches include latent confounders, which may limit performance under real-world confounding; no computational-cost or scalability analysis is reported.
arXiv
ProgramTab: Boosting Table Reasoning of LLMs via Programmatic Paradigm
Pei Guo, Enjie Liu, Yunzhi Tan, Mochi Gao, Jianxin Zhang, Ruichao Zhong, Juntao Li, Bo Hu, Zang Li
Problem
LLMs struggle to reason over large or messy web tables: long tables exceed context limits, and text-to-SQL breaks on tables that lack consistent structure.
Method
ProgramTab uses in-context learning to have the LLM write Python code that cleans and restructures a table, extracts the relevant rows/columns, then generates SQL for the final reasoning step.
Results
With GPT-4o-mini it reaches 89.6% on TabFact and 76.0% on WikiTQ, narrowly beating the strongest baseline H-STAR (+0.2 and +1.1 points); smaller consistent gains also hold with Llama-3.1-70B and GPT-3.5-Turbo.
Limitations
Margins over the best baseline are narrow; the authors note further preprocessing is needed for complex table structures, and code/SQL generation errors are the dominant failure mode, especially on WikiTQ.
No new updates in the industry today.